Supreme Court Appointment: Justice or Politics?
The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States. Its justices are appointed by the president and there are nine judges presiding on the bench. Recently, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg passed away, leaving a vacant seat – and a lot of unrest between the Democrats and Republicans, who have differing views on when Ginsburg’s seat should be filled.
Before Justice Ginsburg died, there were five conservatives and four liberal judges to make decisions, making it a pretty balanced group. On the surface, it may seem that anything coming before the court could be approved if it had a conservative bent to it, but that is not always the case. Oftentimes, right-leaning judges have been known to side with the more liberal judges. However, now the decision on whether to appoint a new judge before the November 3 election is causing concern among the Democrats, who fear another conservative appointment would see six on the right and only three on the left, which could mean the Dems would have a much more difficult time getting their items approved.
The Republicans and President Donald Trump want to seal the appointment as soon as possible, likely before the election. To them, it is a matter of duty to fill the position in a timely manner, as well as making sure the party is represented. To the left, however, they feel such an important decision should wait until after the presidential election and then let the winner appoint the newest justice. With a conservative majority controlling the bench, Democrats are concerned they will have a harder time getting their way on certain issues.
Trump, however, is scheduled to make an announcement as early as Saturday, Sept. 25, on his nominee for Ginsburg seat. The consensus is that he will be announcing Judge Amy Coney Barrett, a conservative 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judge.
Woodpeckers and Wildfires: A Necessary Combination
The wildfires that have been burning up the West Coast have done millions of dollars in damage, seared and destroyed millions of acres, demolished homes, and even taken lives. The tragedy has been plastered across news channels and social media, but not all effects of the fires have been bad. There are critters, such as woodpecker, that depend on fire damaged areas to live. The recent forest fires have helped one species of the woodpecker climb off the endangered species list.
Teresa Lorenz, a wildlife biologist with the U.S. Forest Service’s Pacific Northwest Research Station in Olympia, WA, said, “Woodpeckers are ecosystem engineers. Many small animals, from chipmunks to flying squirrels to mountain bluebirds and wood ducks, compete for the woodpeckers’ vacated nests because they are so protected from the elements and other predators. We wouldn’t have swallows, swifts, or bats without woodpeckers.”
The red-cockaded woodpecker lives in the longleaf pine forests of the southeast and mid-Atlantic. Clear-cut logging shrank its home range to only 3% of its original area. Scientists believed the birds would not be able to escape extinction, but somehow they have grown and thrived. This particular species, however, builds nests in living, not dead, trees – a difficult feat in a fire zone. The work is difficult to hollow out their nests and so, much like humans, they tend to leave the homes to their children and descendants. Males and their offspring have actually lived in the same tree for 30 years.
The trees the red-cockaded woodpecker prefers are created by low-intensity fires – the type of fires and forest maintenance tasks that were deliberately set by Native Americans before the Europeans ever stepped foot on the land. Today, forest managers have to follow the same plan to make sure the woodpecker will have a place to live.
International Deep Sea Station?
Have you ever thought about or wanted to live under the sea? How great it would be to experience marine life up close without having to worry about having enough oxygen or making sure you are not staying under water too long. Fabien Cousteau, the grandson of Jacques Cousteau, practically a legend in his time for underwater research and discovery, has decided to build a state-of-the-art research facility 60 feet below the surface of the ocean.
Fabien started his love of the water at the age of four as he grew up in his grandfather’s flipper steps, joining him on research expeditions. “Scuba diving is an amazing blessing, but there’s a very real limit of time,” he said. Divers cannot be submerged too deep for very long periods of time without becoming ill or even worse. A way to fix that problem is to construct an underwater habitat where researchers can observe, document, and experience marine life without constantly checking their watches and gauges.
“Most of the habitats were purpose-built for one mission or set of missions,” Fabien said, explaining how the Proteus’ size is so much larger than ever before. “They were never conceived as an International Space Station, something that’s to be deployed for a longer period of time.”
It will cost about $135 million to build the underwater space station and operate it for the first three years. Researchers will use the habitat for a plethora of tasks, including drug discovery, climate change, and food production. Like his grandfather, Fabien plans to have a video production facility that will be able to broadcast from the ocean.